The Tragic Hero Glengarry Glen Ross And Death Of A Sales...

Glengarry Glen Ross and Death of a Sales man were two extraordinary plays that were released decades ago and are still the basis of many conversations and debates today. The main protagonists in these plays are Shelley Levene; a middle aged sales man who was once very successful in his line of work, and Willy Lowman; a 62-year-old salesman who has been chasing after the American Dream his whole life. These two shared a lot of similarities, the main one being that they are not tragic heroes. Many writers have debated over the past decades whether or not Shelley and Willy are meant to be tragic heroes. From the views of Aristotle and Miller, they are not tragic heroes. There has been a lot of discussion about what truly defines a tragic hero. If we take a look at the work of well known Philosopher Aristotle, he clearly defined what is needed for a character to be considered a tragic hero. He pointed out 5 specific traits that the person must have to fit the role. They must have skewe d judgement, which normally puts them in the position that they are facing. The character must have a realization during the story, there should be an event where they find out that their immoral ways have led them down a path of destruction. They should figure out their wrong doings on their own by taking the time to reflect upon themselves and understand the mistakes they have been making in life, and how to correct them. The person should be filled with pride, as if no one can touchShow MoreRelatedTragedy And The Common Man Vs Death Of A Salesman1953 Words   |  8 Pagesevaluation of Mamet’s Glengarry Glen Ross and Miller’s Death of a Salesman both depicts a protagonist that grapples with a moral discrepancy of ideals and disillusionment. This conflict is directly affected by a personal choice that later becomes irrevocable. Shelly from Glengarry Glen Ross and Death of a Salesman Willy, struggle to preserve their reputation. Intertwined with external pressure and family dynamics, these characters represent the quintessential elements of a tragic hero. The social standing

The problem with Holden in Catcher in the rye by J.R...

Holden is a complex person with many conflicting characteristics. He has many ambitions and desires for his life but he is faced with the basic conflict in the story, corruption. This corruption is what drives him and at the same time restricts him Holden s being surrounded by corruption disgusts him. There are a few main instances in which Holden encounters corruption directly. One type is Stradlater, the secret slob or Ernie, who performs for the people . Two that affect Holden very much is his brother D.B. selling out to the movies and Pheobe eventually having to grow up. This corruption is very evident in Holden s life and situation. Corruption is what Holden wants to avoid but can not because he wants to grow up†¦show more content†¦Holden finds corruption in almost everything he sees but does not yet even realize that he too is part of that corrupt world the minute he stopped being a child and wanting to be an adult. By doing many of the things he does he displays a desire to grow up, to act mature, to ultimately blend in with society but he is restricted by his ideals of innocence. The way he orders his drinks, dances with the two ladies in the hotel, and sends his money frivolously shows how Holden has

Event Management for Seven Dimensions -myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theEvent Management for Seven Motivational Dimensions. Answer: In the study of Motivational theories, the push and pull theorizing is the primary framework used to formulate and test motivations for event attendance. In this framework, the push factors are considered to be those internal factors that make one travel while the pull factors are the external factors that make one visit some places or take part in some activity. The seek-escape dichotomy is another theory usually used in event motivation. This theory asserts that the wish to seek essential rewards and that to get out of typical environment makes one be involved in leisure activities. Seven motivational dimensions were identified from various studies as discussed below. The dimension of family closeness has an active cultural component. Here, senior married people were found to spend more time with family compared to young couples. Concerning nationality, the South Americans and the Asian tourists valued time with family than the Canadian and U.S guests. It was noted that individuals with lower income appreciated more time with their families unlike those whose annual house income is high. On the basis of sex, females were found to spend more time with the family as than males. The other motivational dimension ascertained was socialization. This shows interaction with people either external socialization which is interaction with new people in the event or internal socialization which is interaction with familiar people. Unlearned visitors valued socialization compared to the learned, visitors from local regions liked socialization unlike visitors from without, people with low income, and the young who had more time with friends (Lee, Lee, Choi, 2011). The motivation to escape or recreate is the desire to relax and refresh both physically and mentally from the day-to-day life pressures. Escape is affected by sex where female preferred getting away for a while than males, Age-wise the young (18-25) preferred getting away from daily routine than those above 30 years (Tkaczynski, Rundle-Thiele, 2011). The study also ascertained event newness as a motivation to attend an event. This is the desire to find out current and different familiarities and sustaining interest. Female guests got moved without difficulty by event newness than male guests. Also, those visiting for the first time esteemed event novelty than the regular visitors. The desire for excitement and enjoyment of visitors to experience entertainment and the atmosphere of a given event and enjoy it were also found out to be event motivators. The unmarried or single people, the young and those out of region attended the festive than their respective equivalents. Most of the international visitors and older people valued cultural events as a motivation to attend various events. Their desire was to increase cultural knowledge, get involved with various cultures and interest in historical and cultural activities. From various studies, it was concluded that in attracting festive visitors, event-specific attributes were very crucial. The question is whether people attend events with different motivations. The research concluded that people attend events because of what the event offers and not just for the sake of it. The study also examined the motivations behind the attendance of music festivals. The attributes that were valued by people when deciding on the music festival to attend were found to be affected by the value for money, accessibility, and availability of information. Based on the results of various researchers, motivations to attend the two festivals - music and cultural differ slightly. Some are present in one, and those present in both have different relative importance attributed to the event. This study identifies essential factors for event motivation. It also ascertains seven motivational dimensions for different reactions to events. Motivation is affected by age, sex, nationality, marital status and education. Further research is recommended on motivations to attend music and diversity and in different data analysis methods. References Lee, J. S., Lee, C. K., Choi, Y. (2011). Examining the role of emotional and functional values in festival evaluation.Journal of Travel Research,50(6), 685-696. Tkaczynski, A., Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2011). Event segmentation: A review and research agenda.Tourism management,32(2), 426-434.

Russian Communism Leninism And Stalinizm Is What Essays

Russian Communism: Leninism and Stalinizm is what? Russian Communism: Leninism and Stalinizm is what? The specter is haunting Europe?the specter of communism... So what is this specter called communism and how haunting is it really? The Webster's Dictionary says that communism is a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party. Karl Marx says that communism is abolition of private property. Others say it is equal division of unequal earnings or it is an opiate of the intellectuals. Even some go so far as to proclaim that communism is a state form of Christianity. The bottom line is?communism is "one-third practice and two-thirds explanation of a failed experiment," as the authors of Twelve Chairs, E. Ilf and I. Petrov, define it. The underlying theme of Twelve Chairs is to define the Russian communism. The authors, though their two protagonists, Ostap Bender and Ippolit Vorobyaninov, use satire and slight exaggeration to ridicule the idiocy and flaws of Soviet social structure in a funny yet touching, melancholy way. The search for bejeweled chairs takes Bender and Vorobyaninov from the provinces of Moscow to the wilds of Soviet Georgia and the Trans-Caucasus Mountanins. Ostap Bender is an unemployed con artist living by his wits in post revolutionary Soviet Russia. He joins forces with Ippolit Vorobyaninov, a former nobleman who has returned to his hometown to find a cache of missing jewels, which were hidden by his mother in one of the twelve chairs. The Soviet authorities had confiscated these chairs, as well as all of Vorobyaninov's possessions including his mansion. Not only does the search for bejeweled chairs serves as a plot device for the novel, it also contributes to ridiculing the Soviet system. On their long and thrilling expedition, Bender and Vorobyaninov satirically inspect progress and success of the Soviet Communism; they come to conclusion, not surprisingly, that there is no success (success of the Soviet Communism) because there was not progress to begin with. Communism, as the novel points out, is inequality, but not as property is. Property is exploitation of the weak by the strong, communism is exploitation of the strong by the weak. How can the weak abuse the strong? Sounds absurd doesn't it? Yet it is the actuality of the Soviet Communism. One of the main points of Soviet propaganda was to get rid of all the wealthy, that is educated upper-middle class, and let the illiterate lower-middle class rule in a classless society. How could such thing be possible? How could people who do not know how to rule be in charge? How could the last be first and the first be last? That is the absurdity of Soviet apparatus, for it goes against the human nature. Because "the light at the end of the tunnel" was to achieve classless society, everyone must be of one class, that is class of the proletariat. Consequently, everyone must be equal. Everyone must live in the same communal apartments, everyone must wear the same type of clothing, everyone must have the same political idea (idea of communism), and everyone must receive the same amount of money for his/her services to the country. And that is, as Bender points out in a dialogue with a Moscow worker, the absurdity of the communist program. "They [communists] went from bad to worse," Bender concludes (78). The implication of that sentence is that Lenin got rid off all the wealthy (those who were in charge in Czarist Russia) and filled the vacuum with the proletariat. Thus all workers became, theoretically and practically, in charge of their factories or mills. And what happens when everyone is in charge thus forming a "classless" society? The answer is simple. Communism or its synonym? nonsense." Furthermore, how can everyone receive the same amount of money for different types of services; how can everyone get paid the same? It's the senselessness of Soviet Communism, as the book points out. In turn, the "equality of wages" created pandemic laziness and slackness in Soviet Union. For instance, imagine yourself an engineer in a factory and imagine your friend, Joe Smith, a simple worker in that same factory. Although you worked considerably harder and longer to get you Ph.D. in engineering and Joe Smith didn't, for he is a simple worker, both of your salaries are about the same. Soon, you will start asking yourself one plain question: how come I work three times harder, both mentally and physically, then Joe Smith yet our paychecks are alike? And little by little you